Even ITT apparently
Context here is that the red one actually voted for the billionaires.
The blue one voted against the billionaires, and the billionaires won because the yellow one didn’t vote.
The secret is both red and blue are establishment parties which seek to help billionaires.
The only difference is the blue parties billionaires are socially conscious, so they’ll act progressive, but won’t rock the boat economically.
Sorry, no. The green one voted for the billionaires, the other green one voted for the billionaires, and the third green one… voted billionaires.
Edit: that’s why they green
They all voted for different billionaires
Ah, yes.
Red party: tax cuts for billionaires, dismantle government agencies and sell the scraps to billionaires for pennies on the dollar, allow billionaires destroy the environment for profit
Blue party: tax billionaires their fair share, use that money to create a better society that is nicer for everyone to live in, address pollution and climate change
Mouth breathers: “they’re the same picture”
The are not the same. You can vote for billionaires who want fascism or billionaires who want neoliberalism.
So quick to attack everyone for some perceived slight.
When op says vote I know what they mean but the vote they are talking about pales compared to the voting we do every day. Everyday we have to the opportunity to vote with our wallets and always, always, always, that vote lands in a billionaires pocket.
This is more “the right and left are the same” nonsense that anyone can see is silly. People calling it silly is not some gotcha.
Guys, guys, this left vs right nonsense is dividing us. We workers just need to unite against the people who own everything. It’s “up” or “forward” or something. Eat the rich! But I’m not sure how exactly because I just invented this idea.
