• cabbage@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m glad they finally found a sustainable solution to the whole “Luigi Mangione is too popular” problem. What could possibly go wrong.

  • The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    That commenter mentioning that votes on reddit were designed as a sorting mechanism for relevance, not agreement/disagreement is 100% right.

    The people currently running that site have lost their minds.

  • frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 days ago

    Why bother even having an upvote/downvote option at this point? Why doesn’t the site just post what they believe is appropriate for users to see?

    • BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I genuinely think a large proportion of Reddit posts have been automated for at least the last 5 years. I’m sure the constant repetition of the exact same jokes and threads can be partially attributed to real users repeating things, but frequently it seemed like things would get repeated multiple times a day for months (or indefinitely). Any thread on specific topics would invariably wind up with the exact same responses.

      Anything to do with Russia? “Hope they don’t fall out a window.”

      Anything to do with any type of disease, in literally any animal or microorganism? “This is how the zombie apocalypse starts.”

      Literally anything political? “Gaslight, Obstruct, Project” with a usually arbitrary “<—you are here” thrown in. Confoundingly would even pop up in non-american threads sometimes.

      I’m sure there are many, many more examples that are slipping my mind now since it’s been years since I’ve browsed Reddit proper, but the point is this type of manufactured popularity has been possible even before the advent of LLMs. Now the systems could be far more complex.

      These companies literally survive on showing advertisers how much traffic they have. Even if the bots aren’t run by the social media companies themselves, they have no incentive to remove bots, only to disguise them as real visitors. It’s a very small jump from that to only allowing posts that express certain opinions to hit the big time. In all likelihood that’s the real reason they introduced vote fuzzing in the first place.

  • gon [he]@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    That is so funny! /g

    I’m genuinely taken aback by the absurdity of that. That’s about as close to a thoughtcrime ruling as I’ve ever seen.