This was published on nature.com.

It looks like the whole article was AI generated.Here are responses from pubpeer.

I never thought I’d see professionals just kind of collectively give up on putting effort into things. Maybe by “fexcectorn” and “frymbial” levels are abnormal?

  • LeninWeave [none/use name, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Nature isn’t really a western journal in any meaningful sense.

    It’s an originally British journal, owned by a British company, owned by a British-German parent company. The vast, vast majority of the editors are born in, educated in, or employed in western countries, mostly all 3 from what I can tell.

    Also this isn’t the nature

    Yes, I pointed this out in my comment as well. It’s all a scam lmao, they want to have it both ways - a prestigious journal and infinite money from pay-to-publish attached to the name of the prestigious journal.

    Scientific publishing is in the toilet. Science is deeply hierarchical and metric driven, actual science is done by the idealistic and the entrenched, or by accident by people climbing the ladder.

    yea